From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. QCHC, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Oct 6, 2022
Civil Action 2:22cv477-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 6, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:22cv477-MHT (WO)

10-06-2022

CRYSTAL MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. QCHC, INC., et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

MYRON H. THOMPSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff having consented to the dismissal of defendants Derrick Cunningham and Sonja Pritchett (Doc. 16), it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all claims against defendants Cunningham and Pritchett are dismissed with prejudice as to them, and said defendants are terminated as parties to this action.

It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 12) is denied as moot.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is not closed and remains pending against all other defendants.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. QCHC, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Oct 6, 2022
Civil Action 2:22cv477-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Mendoza v. QCHC, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. QCHC, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama

Date published: Oct 6, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:22cv477-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 6, 2022)