Opinion
Case No. 12-CV-02215-MMC
03-26-2013
JORGE MENDOZA, an individual, and REYNALDO ESCOBEDO, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. LIGHTNING VAN LINES, INC., a California corporation; HAIM ZAGURI, an individual; and INBAL ZAGURI, an individual, Defendants.
MARK VENARDI, #173140 MARTIN ZURADA, # 218235 VENARDI ZURADA LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jorge Mendoza and Reynaldo Escobedo MICHELLE R. FERBER, #149929 JONATHAN R. BABIONE, #270053 FRANKEL & GOLD WARE, LLP Attorneys for Defendants Lightning Van Lines, Inc., Haim Zaguri, and Inbal Zaguri
MARK VENARDI, #173140
MARTIN ZURADA, # 218235
VENARDI ZURADA LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Jorge Mendoza and Reynaldo Escobedo
MICHELLE R. FERBER, #149929
JONATHAN R. BABIONE, #270053
FRANKEL & GOLD WARE, LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
Lightning Van Lines, Inc., Haim Zaguri, and Inbal Zaguri
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
ALL OF THE PARTIES TO THIS LITIGATION AND THEIR COUNSEL HEREBY STIPULATE TO THE ENTRY OF THIS AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL:
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The parties hereby agree that this case has been settled and that all issues and controversies have been resolved to their mutual satisfaction. The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994): IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH THE PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD.
By: __________
Plaintiff Jorge Mendoza
By: __________
Plaintiff Reynaldo Escobedo
By: __________
Defendant Haim Zaguri
By: __________
Defendant Inbal Zaguri
By: __________
Defendant Lightning Van Lines, Inc.
VENARDI ZURADA LLP
By: __________
Mark Venardi
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Jorge Mendoza and
Reynaldo Escobedo
FRANKEL & GOLD WARE, LLP
By: __________
Michelle R. Ferber
Attorneys for Defendants
Lightning Van Lines, Inc., Haim Zaguri, and
Inbal Zaguri
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The parties shall comply with all of the terms of their confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of All Claims ("Settlement Agreement") entered into on March 5, 2013.
2. By consent of the parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement through December 31, 2014.
3. Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this case is dismissed, with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs.
By: __________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Court Judge