From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Laney

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 26, 2023
No. 02-23-00173-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 26, 2023)

Opinion

02-23-00173-CV

10-26-2023

Joseph Mendoza and Vanessa Acosta, Appellants v. Rachel Laney, Appellee


On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023-001713-1

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

Appellants' brief was due on September 11, 2023, but no brief was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On September 25, 2023, we warned Appellants that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, they filed a brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimeliness. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than ten days have passed, but we have not received a response.

Because Appellants have failed to file a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Laney

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 26, 2023
No. 02-23-00173-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Laney

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Mendoza and Vanessa Acosta, Appellants v. Rachel Laney, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Oct 26, 2023

Citations

No. 02-23-00173-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 26, 2023)