From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Humphrey

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 24, 2011
3:09-cv-00717-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2011)

Opinion

3:09-cv-00717-LRH-VPC.

February 24, 2011


ORDER


Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#40) entered on January 25, 2011, recommending granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#26) filed on September 2, 2010. Plaintiff did not file an objection.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#40) entered on January 25, 2011, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#40) entered on January 25, 2011, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#26) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23rd day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Humphrey

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 24, 2011
3:09-cv-00717-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Humphrey

Case Details

Full title:ELISANDRO MENDOZA Plaintiff, v. STEFANIE HUMPHREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

3:09-cv-00717-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2011)