From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co.

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Aug 16, 2021
S253574 (Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)

Opinion

S253574

08-16-2021

MENDOZA (LEOPOLDO PENA) v. FONSECA McELROY GRINDING CO., INC.


Opinion filed

We answer the Ninth Circuit's question as follows. Section 1772 does not expand the categories of public work that trigger the obligation to pay at least the prevailing wage under section 1771. Here there is no contention that mobilization qualifies as defined “public work.” Under the circumstances, section 1772 does not provide a basis for requiring plaintiffs to be paid the prevailing wage for that work.

Majority Opinion by Corrigan, J.

-- joined by Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Kruger, Groban, and Jenkins, JJ.

Dissenting Opinion by Cuéllar, J.

-- joined by Liu, J.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co.

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Aug 16, 2021
S253574 (Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co.

Case Details

Full title:MENDOZA (LEOPOLDO PENA) v. FONSECA McELROY GRINDING CO., INC.

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Aug 16, 2021

Citations

S253574 (Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)