Opinion
23-CV-11285 (LTS)
01-11-2024
KAREN G. MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. FDIC - FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant.
ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:
Plaintiff brings this action pro se. Plaintiff submitted the application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees, without a signature. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name - or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a); see Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). The Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted Rule 11(a) to require “as it did in John Hancock's day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced).” Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001).
Plaintiff is directed to resubmit the IFP application with an original signature to the court within 30 days of the date of this order. A copy of the IFP application is attached to this order.
No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, this action shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).
SO ORDERED.