Opinion
3:23-cv-00099-ART-CSD
04-13-2023
Kiley A. Harrison (NSBN 16092) McDONALD CARANO LLP James W. Davidson (pro hac vice to be submitted) O'HAGAN MEYER Attorneys for Defendant Crystal Bay Casino, LLC Seth Bayles (NSBN 15700) WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, PLC Thiago M. Coelho Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Kiley A. Harrison (NSBN 16092)
McDONALD CARANO LLP
James W. Davidson (pro hac vice to be submitted)
O'HAGAN MEYER
Attorneys for Defendant Crystal Bay Casino, LLC
Seth Bayles (NSBN 15700)
WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, PLC
Thiago M. Coelho
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, plaintiffs Fernando Mendoza and Sophia Mendoza (the “Mendozas”) and defendant Crystal Bay Casino LLC (“Crystal Bay”) hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for Crystal Bay to answer or otherwise respond to the Mendozas' Class Action Complaint from April 18, 2023, to May 22, 2023.
In support of this Stipulation, the parties jointly state as follows:
1. On March 8, 2023, the Mendozas filed their Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”), asserting claims related to Crystal Bay's alleged failure to secure the Mendozas' and putative class members' personally identifiable information, resulting in a data security incident.
2. The Mendozas served Crystal Bay with the Complaint on March 28, 2023.
3. Crystal Bay's response to the Complaint is due on April 18, 2023.
4. Crystal Bay seeks an extension of time to respond to the Complaint to have sufficient time to gather necessary information and to evaluate whether to move for consolidation of this matter with a related matter pending before the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada, Nguyen v. Crystal Bay Casino, LLC (case no. 3:23-cv-00092-MMD-CLB) before filing a response. Crystal Bay requests the deadline be extended to May 22, 2023 to align the deadline with its response deadline in the Nguyen matter as it anticipates filing nearly identical responses to both complaints.
5. This is Crystal Bay's first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint, the request is not for the purposes of delay, and the requested extension will not prejudice any party.
6. WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for Crystal Bay to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint from April 18, 2023, to May 22, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED: