Opinion
3:21-cv-01503-JR
09-28-2023
MARIA MENDOZA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, by and through PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU, a municipal corporation; PORTLAND POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, in his individual and official capacity; PORTLAND POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, in his individual and official capacity; and PORTLAND POLICE OFFICER JANE DOE, in her individual and official capacity, Defendants.
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on July 21, 2023, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant City of Portland's motion for summary judgment. F&R, ECF 38. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation [38]. Accordingly, Defendant City of Portland's Motion for Summary Judgment [23] is granted and the remaining state law claims are remanded to state court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.