From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1710 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1710 MCE DAD P

09-14-2012

ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


ORDER

A status conference was held in this matter at 10:00 a.m. on September 14, 2012, in the courtroom of the undersigned. Michael Bigelow appeared for petitioner. Justain Riley appeared for respondent. After discussion with counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. On or before October 15, 2012, petitioner may file a motion to expand the record or any other motion he deems appropriate in order to proceed with this action;

2. Respondent shall file an opposition to petitioner's motion on or before November 15, 2012.

3. Petitioner may file a reply to respondent's opposition on or before December 3, 2012.

4. A hearing on petitioner's motion filed pursuant to this order shall he held on December 7, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom #27.

_______________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1710 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 14, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1710 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2012)