From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Cate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
2:09-cv-1710 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:09-cv-1710 MCE DB P

08-27-2021

ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which this Court denied on June 10, 2021. The Court granted a certificate of appealability. Petitioner noticed an appeal, and the appellate court remanded to this Court for the limited purpose of modifying the certificate of appealability to specify which issues met the requisite showing. The Court thus clarifies that the certificate of appealability was granted as to the following issue only: whether Petitioner's counsel was ineffective in the negotiation and entry of his guilty plea based on counsel's misrepresentation that the conviction to which he was pleading guilty was not a “strike” under California's Three Strikes Law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Cate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
2:09-cv-1710 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

2:09-cv-1710 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)