From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2004
13 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-06071.

December 27, 2004.

In an action to recover damages under the uninsured motorist provision of an insurance policy, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated June 27, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff damages in the sums of $100,000 for past pain and suffering and $50,000 for future pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $150,000.

Before: S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and in the interests of justice, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff the principal sum of $150,000 and substituting therefor a provision awarding the plaintiff the principal sum of $50,000; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly.

The evidence was legally sufficient ( see Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493) to support the jury's finding that the plaintiff sustained a significant limitation of use of a body function or system, thereby constituting a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

However, the judgment must be modified by reducing the award of damages to the maximum amount permitted by the subject contract of insurance, to wit, $50,000.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2004
13 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Allstate Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA MENDOZA, Respondent, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

Meegan v. Progressive Ins. Co.

We further conclude that defendant is entitled to a new trial on damages. Contrary to the contentions of…