Mendoza v. Adams

Full title: ADRIAN MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

CV 07-06199 AHS (SS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

ADRIAN MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 07-06199 AHS (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 30, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          ALICEMARIE H. STOTLER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. The Petition is DENIED and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner and on counsel for Respondent.