Opinion
14777-22S
10-26-2022
SANDRA B. MENDOZA-OKPECHI & VICTOR OKPECHI, DECEASED,Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
The notice of deficiency upon which this case is based was issued to Victor Okpechi and S. Mendoza-Okpechi. The petition was signed by petitioner Sandra B. Mendoza-Okpechi and states that Victor Okpechi died before the petition was filed. But Ms. Mendoza-Okpechi failed to state whether she or any person has been duly appointed executor, personal representative, or fiduciary for the Estate of Victor Okpechi, by a court of competent jurisdiction and failed to attach to the petition letters testamentary or letters of administration.
It is well settled that unless the petition is filed by the taxpayer, or by someone lawfully authorized to act on his behalf, we are without jurisdiction. See Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348-349 (1975); Rule 60(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. In pertinent part, Rule 60(c) provides that "The capacity of a fiduciary or other representative to litigate in the Court shall be determined in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction from which such person's authority is derived."
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that, on or before November 17, 2022, petitioners shall file a Response to this Order advising the Court whether any person has been duly appointed the executor, personal representative, or fiduciary for the Estate of Victor Okpechi by a court of competent jurisdiction, and attaching thereto the corresponding letters testamentary or letters of administration.