From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza-Martinez v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 17, 2016
Case No. CV 15-0337-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-0337-DMG (JEM)

06-17-2016

JUAN MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. JACK FOX, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

The Court notes that the notifications to Petitioner of the filing of the Report and Recommendation were returned undeliverable. [Doc. ## 12, 13.] Nonetheless, it is the party's responsibility to keep the Court and opposing counsel apprised of any changes in his address or other contact information. C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.4. Failure to comply with this Local Rule is evidence of a lack of due diligence and does not justify any further delay in the issuance of this Order. --------

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: June 17, 2016

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mendoza-Martinez v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 17, 2016
Case No. CV 15-0337-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Mendoza-Martinez v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:JUAN MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. JACK FOX, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 17, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-0337-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2016)