From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Sweet Sam's Baking Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 26, 2019
18-CV-9910 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 26, 2019)

Opinion

18-CV-9910 (JMF)

12-26-2019

KELVIN MEJIA MENDEZ and ANDRES PEREZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SWEET SAM'S BAKING COMPANY LLC (d/b/a Sweet Sam's Baking Company), DAVID GROGAN, and ESPERANZA LOPEZ, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

:

The parties shall appear on January 10, 2020, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY, for oral argument on their cross-motions to disqualify and preclude. At oral argument, counsel should be prepared to address, in addition to the arguments and issues addressed in their memoranda of law, whether Mr. Androphy's testimony and email — even if relevant to Mr. Perez's credibility — are inadmissible under Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence as extrinsic evidence of specific conduct. See, e.g., Lewis v. Baker, 526 F.2d 470, 475 (2d Cir. 1975) ("The relevancy of testimony which aids in the jury's determination of a party's credibility and veracity has been repeatedly affirmed. Although an opponent is not permitted to adduce extrinsic evidence that a party lied on a previous occasion, he may nonetheless ask questions to that end." (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).

SO ORDERED. Dated: December 26, 2019

New York, New York

/s/_________

JESSE M. FURMAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mendez v. Sweet Sam's Baking Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 26, 2019
18-CV-9910 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Mendez v. Sweet Sam's Baking Co.

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN MEJIA MENDEZ and ANDRES PEREZ, individually and on behalf of others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 26, 2019

Citations

18-CV-9910 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 26, 2019)