From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Robertson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 27, 2024
5:23-cv-00732-JWH-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-00732-JWH-AJR

06-27-2024

HERBERT CORNEJO MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. JIM M. ROBERTSON, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. The Court also notes that Petitioner failed to file a response to the Answer and therefore consented to the denial of the Petition on the merits under L.R.7-12.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
2. Judgment will be entered DENYING the Petition on the merits and DISMISSING this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mendez v. Robertson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 27, 2024
5:23-cv-00732-JWH-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Mendez v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT CORNEJO MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. JIM M. ROBERTSON, WARDEN…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 27, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-00732-JWH-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2024)