From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Reinforcing Ironworkers Union Local 416

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jul 20, 2010
2:09-cv-2332-LRH-RJJ (D. Nev. Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

2:09-cv-2332-LRH-RJJ.

July 20, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Request For Stay of Litigation (#35).

The Court has reviewed the Motion (#35), the Opposition (#38), Response (#39) and the Reply (#41). Based upon its review, the Court finds there is no indication that the EEOC will finalize its investigation in the immediate future. Further, the International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Ironworkers is not subject to the 2009 EEOC claims, but is entitled to a prompt resolution of this case. Good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Request For Stay of Litigation (#35) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Mendez v. Reinforcing Ironworkers Union Local 416

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jul 20, 2010
2:09-cv-2332-LRH-RJJ (D. Nev. Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Mendez v. Reinforcing Ironworkers Union Local 416

Case Details

Full title:BULMARO MENDEZ, etc., et al., Plaintiff, v. REINFORCING IRONWORKERS UNION…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

2:09-cv-2332-LRH-RJJ (D. Nev. Jul. 20, 2010)