From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. FMC-Rochester

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 10, 2007
07-CV-2609(JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 10, 2007)

Opinion

07-CV-2609(JMR/RLE).

August 10, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation, issued June 12, 2007, by the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's objections to the Report were timely filed pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(c)(2).

Based upon a de novo review of the record herein, the Court adopts the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 3]. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3).

2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [Docket No. 2] is denied as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Mendez v. FMC-Rochester

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 10, 2007
07-CV-2609(JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Mendez v. FMC-Rochester

Case Details

Full title:Raphael Mendez v. FMC-Rochester et al

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 10, 2007

Citations

07-CV-2609(JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 10, 2007)

Citing Cases

Butler v. U.S.

As an inmate at a BOP facility, Butler can seek relief under the BOP's administrative remedy procedures, set…

Archambault v. United States

"[T]o state an actionable Bivens claim, a plaintiff must show (1) a violation of a constitutional right, (2)…