From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Diaz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 22, 2021
EDCV 20-1987-ODW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

EDCV 20-1987-ODW (AGR)

12-22-2021

GABRIEL MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

OTIS D. WRIGHT II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 21, 2020, Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The case was transferred to this judicial district.

On October 25, 2021, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff's complaint with leave to file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days after entry of the order. Plaintiff was warned that absent a viable federal claim, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims.

The Court further warned Plaintiff that failure to file a timely First Amended Complaint will result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff did not file a First Amended Complaint or request an extension of time to do so within the time allowed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mendez v. Diaz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 22, 2021
EDCV 20-1987-ODW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Mendez v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:GABRIEL MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

EDCV 20-1987-ODW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)