From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Contreras

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 3, 2023
22-cv-04677-AMO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-04677-AMO (PR)

08-03-2023

JOVANNY J. MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. C. CONTRERAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS UNNECESSARY RE: DKT. NO. 29

ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN United States District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for an extension of time “to properly review the court[']s documents.” Dkt. 29. Because no pending deadline exists for plaintiff, such a request is DENIED as unnecessary.

Defendants are reminded that they must file a motion for summary judgment, or other dispositive motion, by no later than August 18, 2023. Plaintiff shall file an opposition, or notice of non-opposition, within twenty-eight (28) days of receiving defendants' motion, and defendants shall file a reply to any opposition within fourteen (14) days thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mendez v. Contreras

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 3, 2023
22-cv-04677-AMO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Mendez v. Contreras

Case Details

Full title:JOVANNY J. MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. C. CONTRERAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 3, 2023

Citations

22-cv-04677-AMO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2023)