From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Bureau of Prisons

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 24, 2010
391 F. App'x 577 (8th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-3972.

Submitted: August 19, 2010.

Filed: August 24, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Raphael Mendez, Rochester, MN, pro se.

Ana H. Voss, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Raphael Mendez, an involuntarily committed federal detainee who is confined at the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and its denial of his judicial-disqualification motion. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court properly denied Mendez's motion to disqualify, see Am. Prairie Constr. Co. v. Hoich, 560 F.3d 780, 789 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); and, for the reasons relied upon by the district court, we conclude that Mendez is not entitled to habeas relief, see Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.


Summaries of

Mendez v. Bureau of Prisons

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 24, 2010
391 F. App'x 577 (8th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Mendez v. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:Raphael MENDEZ, Appellant, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS; M. Haugen; M. Stalker…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Aug 24, 2010

Citations

391 F. App'x 577 (8th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Mendez v. Kallis

Mendez has filed multiple habeas petitions challenging his commitment. See, e.g., Mendez v. Kallis, No.…

Mendez v. FMC Rochester

The following facts were found by Judge Docherty in the R&R, and Mr. Mendez does not object. A thorough…