From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez Hammonds v. McGrath

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2006
No. 2:02-cv-0540-MCE-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)

Opinion

No. 2:02-cv-0540-MCE-DAD-P.

February 8, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 18, 2005, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 18, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Mendez Hammonds v. McGrath

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2006
No. 2:02-cv-0540-MCE-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Mendez Hammonds v. McGrath

Case Details

Full title:LOUIE IRA MENDEZ HAMMONDS, Petitioner, v. JOE McGRATH, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

No. 2:02-cv-0540-MCE-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)