Opinion
Argued May 12, 1930
Decided June 3, 1930
Appeal from the Court of Claims.
Joseph Sterling for appellants.
Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General ( L.A. Walker of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the enabling act, chapter 601 of the Laws of 1929, is in conflict with article 7, section 6, of the Constitution of the State; no opinion.
Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Not sitting: LEHMAN, J.