From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Menchaca v. Barclays Bank Del.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 6, 2024
2:24-cv-03126-FMO-E (C.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-03126-FMO-E

11-06-2024

ROSIE MENCHACA, Plaintiff, v. BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE and SUTTELL & HAMMER, P.S., Defendant.


ORDER ON STIPULATION [24]

HON. FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation, Plaintiff Rosie Menchaca's claims against Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware and Defendant Suttell & Hammer, P.S., are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Menchaca v. Barclays Bank Del.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 6, 2024
2:24-cv-03126-FMO-E (C.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Menchaca v. Barclays Bank Del.

Case Details

Full title:ROSIE MENCHACA, Plaintiff, v. BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE and SUTTELL & HAMMER…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 6, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-03126-FMO-E (C.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2024)