From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Menashi v. Menashi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted February 9, 2001.

March 19, 2001.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered November 9, 1999, as awarded the defendant pendente lite child support and tax-free maintenance in the amounts of $2,267 and $3,000 per month, respectively, directed him to pay the unreimbursed medical expenses of the defendant and the parties' son, and awarded the defendant an interim attorney's fee and an expert fee in the sums of $10,000 and $5,000, respectively, and (2) an order of the same court, dated April 6, 2000, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew.

Hyman Gilbert, Larchmont, N.Y. (Michael D. Weinstein of counsel), for appellant.

Luis Andrew Penichet, White Plains, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The proper remedy for any perceived inequities in a pendente lite award is a speedy trial (see, Tillinger v. Tillinger, 141 A.D.2d 535, 536; see also, Frankenbach v. Frankenbach, 244 A.D.2d 524; Walker v. Walker, 193 A.D.2d 730). An appellate court will rarely modify such an award, "and then only under exigent circumstances such as where a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations or justice otherwise requires" (Bagner v. Bagner, 207 A.D.2d 367, 368). The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that such circumstances exist. Accordingly, modification of the award is not warranted.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Menashi v. Menashi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Menashi v. Menashi

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MENASHI, APPELLANT, v. PAMELA G. MENASHI, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Taylor

Contrary to the husband's contention, the Supreme Court set forth in sufficient detail the factors it…

Campanaro v. Campanaro

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Pendente lite awards should reflect…