From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mena v. Link Tronics Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 15, 2024
8:24-cv-02101-DOC-AJR (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-cv-02101-DOC-AJR

11-15-2024

Robert Mena v. Link Tronics Corporation

Karlen Dubon


Karlen Dubon

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel to submit a response in writing no later than November 18, 2024 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above Dated:

X Answer to the complaint;

X Request for Entry of Default; or

X Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41)

It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiffs must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.

Failure to respond by the date above will result in a Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution.


Summaries of

Mena v. Link Tronics Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 15, 2024
8:24-cv-02101-DOC-AJR (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Mena v. Link Tronics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Robert Mena v. Link Tronics Corporation

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2024

Citations

8:24-cv-02101-DOC-AJR (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2024)