From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mena v. Angel Auto Spa LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 27, 2024
8:24-cv-00630-DOC-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-cv-00630-DOC-DFM

06-27-2024

Robert Mena v. Angel Auto Spa LLC., et al.


Present: The Honorable DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel to submit a response in writing no later than July 10, 2024 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above Dated:

X Request for Entry of Default or Answer to the complaint as to Defendant COSTA MESA OIL COMPANY, INC.
X Plaintiff filing a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (F.R. Civ.P 55b) as to defendant COSTA MESA INVESTMENTS, LLC
X Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41)

It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiffs must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.

Failure to respond by the date above will result in a Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution.


Summaries of

Mena v. Angel Auto Spa LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 27, 2024
8:24-cv-00630-DOC-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Mena v. Angel Auto Spa LLC

Case Details

Full title:Robert Mena v. Angel Auto Spa LLC., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 27, 2024

Citations

8:24-cv-00630-DOC-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2024)