From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MemoryTen, Inc. v. LV Admin. Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00993-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00993-WJM-BNB

02-20-2013

MEMORYTEN, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. LV ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., a Cayman Islands corporation, LAURUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, VALENS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a New York limited liability company, VALENS INVESTMENT ADVISORS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, WAY TECHNOLOGY, LLC, SILICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC., a Colorado corporation, and SILICON MOUNTAIN MEMORY, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland


ORDER

This matter arises on the plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 116, filed 2/15/2013] (the "Motion to Amend"). It appears that the amendment in intended solely to substitute Way Tech LLC for Way Technology LLC, but the proposed Second Amended Complaint is not attached to the Motion to Amend. I will not consider a motion to amend unless the proposed amended pleading is attached as an exhibit.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Amend [Doc. # 116] is DENIED without prejudice, to be renewed by a substituted motion which includes the proposed Second Amended Complaint as an exhibit.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

MemoryTen, Inc. v. LV Admin. Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00993-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

MemoryTen, Inc. v. LV Admin. Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MEMORYTEN, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. LV ADMINISTRATIVE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00993-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 20, 2013)