From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 10, 1987
184 Ga. App. 176 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

In Memorial Med. Center v. Moore, 184 Ga. App. 176 (361 S.E.2d 49) (1987), we dismissed an appeal brought by the appellants from an order allowing the appellees to dismiss their complaint without prejudice, holding that because the appellants' counterclaims had not yet been dismissed, the case technically remained pending in the lower court.

Summary of this case from Harvey v. Moore

Opinion

74964.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1987.

Wrongful death. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Gadsden.

Lee C. Mundell, Anne C. Marscher, for appellants.

Carlton R. Stewart, Benjamin S. Williams, for appellees.


The appellees sued the appellants to recover for the alleged wrongful death of their child resulting from medical malpractice. The appellants counterclaimed, pursuant to Yost v. Torok, 256 Ga. 92 ( 344 S.E.2d 414) (1986), to recover damages for abusive litigation. Without notice to the appellants, the appellees subsequently filed a notice of voluntary dismissal and, on the same day, obtained an ex parte order from the trial court dismissing their complaint without prejudice. The appellants responded with a "motion to strike and objection to [appellees'] voluntary dismissal." The trial court subsequently denied that motion but further ruled that "the [appellants] shall be allowed to independently adjudicate its (sic) Yost counterclaim presently pending in the action." The appellants filed a direct appeal from this order. The appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal based on the pendency of the counterclaim and on the appellants' failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34. Held:

"While Yost eliminated the requirement that claims for malicious use of process be brought in a subsequent action, it did not change the requirement of a favorable termination." Rothstein v. L. F. Still Co., 181 Ga. App. 113, 116 ( 351 S.E.2d 513) (1986). Accord Smith v. Pierce, 179 Ga. App. 724, 725 (4) ( 347 S.E.2d 692) (1986). "[A] voluntary dismissal [without prejudice] is not a termination of the suit in [defendant's] favor. (Cit.)" Rothstein, supra at 115-116. It follows that the trial court was incorrect in concluding that the appellants could continue to pursue their Yost counterclaim against the appellees as an independent action, notwithstanding the appellees' voluntary dismissal of their complaint. However, since the counterclaim was never actually dismissed, technically speaking it still remains pending in the court below. Consequently, the dismissal of the complaint cannot be considered a final judgment within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), and it follows that we are without jurisdiction to entertain a direct appeal from it.

We reject the appellants' contention that the trial court's actions somehow resulted in a severance of the main claim from the counterclaim pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-21, so as to establish the main claim as an independent action, the dismissal of which was directly appealable pursuant to Pizza Ring Enterprises v. Mills Mgt. Sources, 154 Ga. App. 45 (1) ( 267 S.E.2d 487) (1980). In the first place, OCGA § 9-11-21 deals with the joinder and severance of claims asserted against different parties, not the same party. Consequently, it is inapplicable to this case. In the second place, there was obviously no intention on the part of the trial judge to sever the main claim from the counterclaim prior to the dismissal of the main claim, so as to enable the two claims to proceed as independent actions. Indeed, such a ruling would have been both totally illogical and contrary to the express mandate of Yost, supra.

Appeal dismissed. Carley and Benham, JJ., concur.


DECIDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1987.


Summaries of

Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 10, 1987
184 Ga. App. 176 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)

In Memorial Med. Center v. Moore, 184 Ga. App. 176 (361 S.E.2d 49) (1987), we dismissed an appeal brought by the appellants from an order allowing the appellees to dismiss their complaint without prejudice, holding that because the appellants' counterclaims had not yet been dismissed, the case technically remained pending in the lower court.

Summary of this case from Harvey v. Moore

In Memorial Med. Center even though the appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, nevertheless, this court noted that the lower court was incorrect in concluding the defendant could continue to pursue the Yost counterclaim because the counterclaim in that case required termination of the plaintiff's claim in favor of defendant.

Summary of this case from Chatham County Hosp. Auth. v. Mack
Case details for

Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al. v. MOORE et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 10, 1987

Citations

184 Ga. App. 176 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)
361 S.E.2d 49

Citing Cases

McGregor v. Stachel

Under these circumstances, appeal from the order dismissing McGregor's claim is premature and not subject to…

Harvey v. Moore

This is the second appearance of the case before this court. In Memorial Med. Center v. Moore, 184 Ga. App.…