From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Membreno-Rivera v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2015
604 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-2102

05-28-2015

CARLOS ROBERTO MEMBRENO-RIVERA, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

Gaddiel K. Baah, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GOREN, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer Williams, Senior Litigation Counsel, Yedidya Cohen, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gaddiel K. Baah, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GOREN, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer Williams, Senior Litigation Counsel, Yedidya Cohen, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carlos Roberto Membreno-Rivera, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Membreno-Rivera's merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Membreno-Rivera (B.I.A. Sept. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Membreno-Rivera v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2015
604 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Membreno-Rivera v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ROBERTO MEMBRENO-RIVERA, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 28, 2015

Citations

604 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2015)