From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melwani v. Lipton

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 19, 2022
17 Civ. 8308 (PGG) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2022)

Opinion

17 Civ. 8308 (PGG) (SLC)

09-19-2022

LOKESH MELWANI and CANTAL TRADE LTD., Plaintiffs, v. HUNTER LIPTON, EAGLE POINT FINANCIAL LLC, and MDF HOLDINGS LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

Paul G. Gardephe United States District Judge

In this breach of contract action, Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff Cantal Trade Ltd.'s claims for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). (Dkt. No. 160) Cantal Trade Ltd. has not opposed the motion.

In a February 10, 2022 letter, pro se Plaintiff Lokesh Melwani responded to the motion, asking this Court “to not enter default judgment against Cantal [Trade Ltd.] at this stage of the proceeding.” (Pltf. Ltr. (Dkt. No. 162))

In a January 18, 2022 order, this Court warned that “Cantal Trade Ltd. cannot appear in this lawsuit other than through counsel.” (Dkt. No. 158) No attorney has since appeared on behalf of Cantal Trade Ltd.

A corporate entity cannot appear other than through counsel. See Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007) (“[A] limited liability company . . . may appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney.”); United States ex rel. Mergent Servs. v. Flaherty, 540 F.3d 89, 92 (2d Cir. 2008) (“[A] layman may not represent a corporation even if the sole shareholder.” (citations omitted)); see also Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 202-03 (1993). Where, as here, a plaintiff corporation has been repeatedly warned that its claims will be dismissed absent retention of counsel, and it has failed to appear through counsel, dismissal is appropriate. See, e.g., Liberty Synergistics, Inc. v. Microflo, Ltd., No. 11-CV-523 (JMA) (SIL), 2017 WL 9512403, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. May 11, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, 2017 WL 4119268 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2017) (dismissing corporate plaintiff's claims under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) where it had failed to appear through counsel).

Accordingly, Plaintiff Cantal Trade Ltd.'s claims are dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion (Dkt. No. 160). Dated: New York, New York September 19, 2022

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Melwani v. Lipton

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 19, 2022
17 Civ. 8308 (PGG) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Melwani v. Lipton

Case Details

Full title:LOKESH MELWANI and CANTAL TRADE LTD., Plaintiffs, v. HUNTER LIPTON, EAGLE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 19, 2022

Citations

17 Civ. 8308 (PGG) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2022)