From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melvin v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 10, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find no basis to conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in apportioning counsel fees in this case ( see, Matter of Budin, Reisman Schwartz v Giamboi, Reiss Squitieri, 224 A.D.2d 325; see generally, Matter of Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero Bell, 81 N.Y.2d 655; Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., 73 N.Y.2d 454).

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Melvin v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Melvin v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:COBER MELVIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 544

Citing Cases

Simas v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. We find no merit to the appellant's…

Ben-Aroya v. Plotke

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court…