From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melton v. Joyner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 21, 2013
543 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7088

2013-10-21

JERRY WAYNE MELTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CARLTON JOYNER, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.

Jerry Wayne Melton, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00145-CCE-LPA) Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Wayne Melton, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jerry Wayne Melton seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Melton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Melton's motion for transcripts, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Melton v. Joyner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 21, 2013
543 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Melton v. Joyner

Case Details

Full title:JERRY WAYNE MELTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CARLTON JOYNER, STATE OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 21, 2013

Citations

543 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2013)