Opinion
3:16-CV-00670-MMD-CLB
04-05-2022
JOHN MELNIK, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DZURENDA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [ECF Nos. 98, 99]
Plaintiff John Melnik (“Melnik”) filed a motion to enforce settlement agreement claiming that Defendants failed to remove $1, 961.26 in institutional debt from Melnik's account. (ECF No. 98, 99.) Defendants responded to the motion providing a copy of Melnik's account transaction summary evidencing removal of $1, 961.26 in debt on March 8, 2022 as agreed. (ECF No. 100.) Therefore, Melnik's motion to enforce settlement agreement is DENIED as moot. (ECF No. 98, 99.) The Court will not order sanctions as requested by Defendants; however, Melnik is cautioned that should he have any further concerns regarding the settlement agreement, he must meet and confer with defense counsel before filing any motion with this Court.
ECF Nos. 98 and 99 are duplicate documents.