From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melmed v. B.F. Gladding Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 14, 1952
279 App. Div. 1128 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

May 14, 1952.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Chenango County.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


The motion was made pursuant to section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The order of the Special Term was discretionary and the facts do not establish an abuse of discretion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Melmed v. B.F. Gladding Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 14, 1952
279 App. Div. 1128 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Melmed v. B.F. Gladding Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RUTH MELMED, Respondent, v. B.F. GLADDING Co., INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 14, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 1128 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre

I have received no affidavit tending to show negligence in the defendant or freedom from contributory…

Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.

There is no proof of merits whatsoever, and no factual statement or medical affidavit as to the nature and…