From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melko v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1991
172 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 22, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Brown, J.).


Ordered, that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the defendants' motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff was injured when, as he slid toward home plate during an amateur softball game, he came into abrupt contact with a depression in the surface of the field. In their motions for summary judgment, the defendants produced evidence that the plaintiff was aware of the alleged depression on the field, and that he had in fact complained about it before the game. Under these circumstances, it is clear that the risk presented to the players by this defect in the playing surface cannot be viewed as a concealed one, and that it must, therefore, be considered as one which was consciously assumed by the plaintiff (see, Hoffman v. City of New York, 172 A.D.2d 716 [decided herewith]; cf., Henig v. Hofstra Univ., 160 A.D.2d 761). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Melko v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1991
172 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Melko v. Town of Islip

Case Details

Full title:PAUL MELKO, Respondent, v. TOWN OF ISLIP et al., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
569 N.Y.S.2d 100

Citing Cases

Strauss v. Town of Oyster Bay

520). The plaintiff failed to raise a genuine triable issue of fact with respect to the contention that the…

Pascucci v. Town of Oyster Bay

We affirm. It is well settled that those who voluntarily participate in a sporting activity "may be held to…