From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melish v. Melish

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1999
267 A.D.2d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted October 20, 1999

December 6, 1999

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated November 10, 1987, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated January 20, 1998, which denied his motion to vacate a prior order of the same court, dated December 23, 1998, granting the motion of the plaintiff former wife for a transfer to her of his interest in the former marital residence, upon his default in responding to the motion.

Joseph Trotti, Bayside, N.Y., for appellant.

Deborah G. Fiss, Jackson Heights, N.Y., for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On his motion to vacate his default, the defendant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense to the underlying motion ( see, Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568; Fennell v. Mason, 204 A.D.2d 599). The Supreme Court properly denied the motion, as the defendant's affidavit of merit, which contained only conclusory assertions, was insufficient to establish a meritorious defense to the underlying motion ( see, Peterson v. Scandurra Trucking Co., 226 A.D.2d 691; Lener v. Club Med, 168 A.D.2d 433; Starr Block Co. v. Tedesco, 146 A.D.2d 692).

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Melish v. Melish

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1999
267 A.D.2d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Melish v. Melish

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE MELISH, respondent, v. ANDREW AUGUST MELISH, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 305

Citing Cases

Yurteri v. Artukmac

Ordered that the order dated July 26, 2004 is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. A party seeking…

Toner v. Staebler

The law is well settled that in seeking to vacate a default, a Defendant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse…