From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melino v. Lauster

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1993
82 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1993)

Opinion

Decided November 22, 1993

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, George L. Cobb, J.

Lewis Stanzione, Catskill (Ralph C. Lewis, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Edward B. Downey, Albany, and Kris T. Jackstadt for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 195 A.D.2d 653).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and JUDGES SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.


Summaries of

Melino v. Lauster

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1993
82 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1993)
Case details for

Melino v. Lauster

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE MELINO, Appellant, v. RHONDA L. LAUSTER et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1993

Citations

82 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 4
625 N.E.2d 589

Citing Cases

Tejerina v. Poncet

Defendants are not required to disprove any category of serious injury which has not been properly pled by…

Osegueda v. Nicklas

It is noted at the outset that defendant is not required to disprove any category of serious injury which…