From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mele v. Waterbury Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1914
164 App. Div. 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

October, 1914.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of giving plaintiff, accompanied by not more than two persons, an inspection of the machine by which he claims to have been hurt, together with its equipment and appurtenances; that such persons be permitted to examine during business hours such machine, both in operation and at rest, and to take a photograph of the same; that plaintiff give in writing notice to defendant's attorneys, two days before such inspection, of the day and hour when the same will be had, and that at the time named such inspection and photograph be made within a period not exceeding fifteen minutes. (See Pasuk v. American Manufacturing Co., 160 App. Div. 909.) Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Mele v. Waterbury Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1914
164 App. Div. 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Mele v. Waterbury Co.

Case Details

Full title:Giuseppe Mele, Appellant, v. The Waterbury Company, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1914

Citations

164 App. Div. 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
149 N.Y.S. 1096