From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melchiorre v. Dreisch

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2012
95 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-1

Anne Marie MELCHIORRE, respondent, v. Matthew N. DREISCH, appellant.

Connors & Connors, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (Robert J. Pfuhler of counsel), for appellant. Block O'Toole & Murphy, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Robyn Brazzil of counsel), for respondent.


Connors & Connors, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (Robert J. Pfuhler of counsel), for appellant. Block O'Toole & Murphy, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Robyn Brazzil of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J.), dated June 7, 2011, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied.

In support of her motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, that she used due care in crossing the street and, thus, that the defendant's alleged negligent operation of his vehicle was the sole proximate cause of the accident ( see Thoma v. Ronai, 82 N.Y.2d 736, 737, 602 N.Y.S.2d 323, 621 N.E.2d 690; Cohn v. Khan, 89 A.D.3d 1052, 1053, 933 N.Y.S.2d 403; Roman v. A1 Limousine, Inc., 76 A.D.3d 552, 907 N.Y.S.2d 251; Yuen Lum v. Wallace, 70 A.D.3d 1013, 1014, 897 N.Y.S.2d 454). The plaintiff's failure to meet her prima facie burden required denial of her motion without regard to the sufficiency of the defendant's opposition papers ( see Yuen Lum v. Wallace, 70 A.D.3d at 1014, 897 N.Y.S.2d 454).

BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Melchiorre v. Dreisch

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2012
95 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Melchiorre v. Dreisch

Case Details

Full title:Anne Marie MELCHIORRE, respondent, v. Matthew N. DREISCH, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3419
942 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Sipes v. Lambert

There can be more than one proximate cause and, thus, the proponent of a summary judgment motion has the…

Roberts v. Zirkind

The issue of comparative fault is generally a question for the jury to decide (see Rodriguez v. Klein, 116…