From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mejia v. The Urgent Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2022
22 Civ. 2827 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 2827 (ER)

06-15-2022

JOSE MEJIA, Plaintiff, v. THE URGENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retainjurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mejia v. The Urgent Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2022
22 Civ. 2827 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Mejia v. The Urgent Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MEJIA, Plaintiff, v. THE URGENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 2827 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)