Mejia v. Nguyen

Full title: OSCAR MEJIA, Plaintiff, v. LUONG NGUYEN, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 25, 2023

1:21-cv-00832 GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00832 GSA (PC)

10-25-2023

OSCAR MEJIA, Plaintiff, v. LUONG NGUYEN, et al., Defendants.

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(ECF NO. 33)

PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE NOVEMBER 16, 2023

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Before this Court is the parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to File Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 33. In support of the motion, the parties state that Plaintiff needs the extension due to the challenges associated with Plaintiff's counsel communicating with Plaintiff and obtaining a declaration from him. Id. at 1. In addition, the motion points out that as an incarcerated person, Plaintiff is unable to communicate freely, which also warrants a grant of additional time. Id.

The parties agree that Plaintiff shall have until November 16, 2023, to file a response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 33 at 1. The request is made in good faith, and it is signed by counsel for all parties. Id.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to File Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED, and

2. Plaintiff shall have until November 16, 2023, to file a response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.