From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mejia v. Kirk

United States District Court, District of Utah
Nov 17, 2022
2:22-cv-00542-DAK-DBP (D. Utah Nov. 17, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00542-DAK-DBP

11-17-2022

Eduardo Romero Mejia, Plaintiff, v. Geoffrey Kirk, et al, Defendants.


Dale A. Kimball District Judge

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge

Before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.[ (ECF No. 11.) Defendants seek to dismiss “all causes of action except the Fourth Cause of Action, which purports to be a malicious protection claim.” (ECF No. 11 p. 1.) In response, Plaintiff agrees to dismiss all causes of action except the Fourth Cause of Action. (ECF No. 12.) Accordingly, the undersigned recommends below that the Motion be granted.

This matter is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

RECOMMENDATION

Based upon the Defendants' motion, and on Plaintiff's stated agreement to dismiss all the causes of action except the Fourth Cause of Action, the undersigned recommends that Defendants' Motion be GRANTED.

Copies of the foregoing Report and Recommendation are being sent to all parties who are hereby notified of their right to object. Within fourteen (14) days of being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Failure to object may constitute a waiver of objections upon subsequent review.


Summaries of

Mejia v. Kirk

United States District Court, District of Utah
Nov 17, 2022
2:22-cv-00542-DAK-DBP (D. Utah Nov. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Mejia v. Kirk

Case Details

Full title:Eduardo Romero Mejia, Plaintiff, v. Geoffrey Kirk, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Utah

Date published: Nov 17, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00542-DAK-DBP (D. Utah Nov. 17, 2022)