From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mejia v. Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 1, 2019
Case No. 2:18-cv-01735-CAS-GJS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-01735-CAS-GJS

10-01-2019

JARETT MEJIA, Plaintiff v. OFFICER GOMEZ AND OFFICER ALVAREZ, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all pleadings and other documents filed in this action, the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 25, "Motion"), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 30, "Report"). No objections to the Report have been filed within the time allowed. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant Matthew Gomez is DENIED; and (2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant Gonzalo Alvarez is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: October 1, 2019

/s/_________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mejia v. Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 1, 2019
Case No. 2:18-cv-01735-CAS-GJS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Mejia v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:JARETT MEJIA, Plaintiff v. OFFICER GOMEZ AND OFFICER ALVAREZ, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-01735-CAS-GJS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2019)