Opinion
16-73019
08-25-2022
DIEGO MEJIA-DURAN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A206-883-753
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
Diego Mejia-Duran, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal's order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency's factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review.
In Mejia-Duran's opening brief, he does not raise, and therefore waives, any challenge to the agency's dispositive conclusion that he failed to establish his proposed particular social group was cognizable. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party's opening brief are waived). Thus, Mejia-Duran's asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.
Substantial evidence supports the agency's denial of CAT protection because Mejia-Duran failed to establish it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).
The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).