From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meister v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1987
133 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

September 28, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff's decedent, a teacher, requested that a student who had threatened her be removed from her class. On February 8, 1983, she was advised that the School Based Support Team of the defendant Board of Education of the City of New York had recommended the student's transfer to a special education program. On February 24, 1983, the student, who had not yet been removed from the class, attacked the plaintiff's decedent and injured her.

The undisputed facts established that the defendants did not assume an affirmative duty to protect the plaintiff's decedent from the student in question. The defendants initiated the process by which the student could be removed from the plaintiff's decedent's class, but it did not notify her that the student would, in fact, be removed. Therefore, the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted (see, Cuffy v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 255, mot to amend remittitur dismissed 70 N.Y.2d 667). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Niehoff and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meister v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1987
133 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Meister v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MEISTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Sostre v. City of New York Housing Authority

In this case the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of triable issues of fact as to the elements…