From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meisman v. Fremont Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02686-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02686-LTB

12-09-2011

JOSHUA ALAN MEISMAN, Plaintiff, v. FREMONT COUNTY, COLORADO, 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JULIE RHODEN, Deputy District Attorney, MICHAEL PIRRAGLIA, II, Deputy District Attorney, FREMONT COUNTY COURT, and JUDGE NORMAN C. COOLING, County Court Judge, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Babcock, Senior Judge

Plaintiff has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Plaintiff previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because plaintiff has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not taken in good faith.

BY THE COURT:

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Meisman v. Fremont Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02686-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Meisman v. Fremont Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA ALAN MEISMAN, Plaintiff, v. FREMONT COUNTY, COLORADO, 11th JUDICIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02686-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 9, 2011)