From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meisle v. N. Y. Central and H. R. R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

May, 1915.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented and voted for affirmance.


We think there was no evidence to justify the verdict of the jury that the defendant was negligent or that it could have anticipated such an accident as occurred and which resulted in the death of the plaintiff's intestate. The judgment is, therefore, reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.


Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

Meisle v. N. Y. Central and H. R. R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Meisle v. N. Y. Central and H. R. R.R

Case Details

Full title:NELLIE MEISLE, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1915

Citations

168 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)