From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meiselman v. Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Summary

In Meiselman v Allstate Ins. Co. (197 AD2d 561 [2d Dept 1993]), the Court held that the trial court properly concluded that the defendant's unconditional tender of the judgment amount stopped the running of postjudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5003.

Summary of this case from Allison v. Erie County Indus

Opinion

October 12, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendant's unconditional tender of the judgment amount stopped the running of postjudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5003 (see, Pellegrino v. State of New York, 133 Misc.2d 888, affd 139 A.D.2d 502; cf., Martin v. Tafflock, 166 A.D.2d 635; Juracka v Ferrara, 120 A.D.2d 822; Pollock v. Collipp, 138 A.D.2d 584; see also, 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 5003.01). Thompson, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meiselman v. Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

In Meiselman v Allstate Ins. Co. (197 AD2d 561 [2d Dept 1993]), the Court held that the trial court properly concluded that the defendant's unconditional tender of the judgment amount stopped the running of postjudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5003.

Summary of this case from Allison v. Erie County Indus
Case details for

Meiselman v. Allstate Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE D. MEISELMAN, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 659

Citing Cases

Zavelin v. Greenberg

It is well regarded that "[b]arring any inequitable or dilatory conduct on the part of the judgment creditor,…

Wireman v. Reith

The court must recalculate the amount of postjudgment interest owed to the plaintiffs. Each of the four…