From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meireles v. Lakeland Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1994
208 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit of the plaintiff's treating physician, Dr. Walter Szpur, indicated that on January 11, 1993, almost 18 months after the accident, there was a 40% deficit in the range of motion of plaintiff's cervical spine and, based on this predicate, concluded that the plaintiff experienced a permanent partial disability. The affidavit was sufficient to warrant denial of the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Lopez v. Senatore, 65 N.Y.2d 1017; Lamarre v. Troop, 202 A.D.2d 645; cf., McHaffie v. Antieri, 190 A.D.2d 780; Philpotts v. Petrovic, 160 A.D.2d 856). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meireles v. Lakeland Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1994
208 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Meireles v. Lakeland Central School District

Case Details

Full title:ALCINO MEIRELES, Respondent, v. LAKELAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 3, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 42

Citing Cases

Vitale v. Lev Express Cab Corp.

The affirmation also stated that the restrictions were permanent in nature. The affirmation was sufficient to…

Bonilla v. Fine Homes Construction Co.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is…